After a pool refurbishment — retiling, anti-slip treatment, mechanical re-finishing, or surround replacement — independent UKAS-accredited pendulum and surface roughness testing verifies that the work has actually achieved the target slip resistance. Without verification, the remediation is undocumented; with verification, the operator's file shows what was done and what was achieved.
Pool refurbishment is normally commissioned because a previous test, an incident, or a routine inspection identified a non-compliant surface. The contractor will quote an expected PTV uplift, but actual uplift depends on the substrate, the application technique, the curing conditions, and the cleaning regime that follows. Verification converts 'expected' into 'measured'.
For risk-management and claim-defence purposes, the file should contain: the original test showing non-compliance; the work order and certificates of refurbishment; and the post-work test showing compliance has been restored. This three-document chain is the documentary evidence that the operator both identified and resolved the issue.
Verification testing is most useful where the methodology matches the original baseline test — same locations, same sliders (55, 57 and/or 96), same wet/dry approach, same standard reference. This produces directly comparable PTV deltas at each test point. UKAS-accredited methodology on both visits makes the comparison robust to challenge.
Most pool refurbishment treatments require a curing period before they reach final performance:
| Treatment type | Minimum cure before re-test |
|---|---|
| Chemical etching (acid-based) | 7 days, with thorough rinsing |
| Chemical etching (fluoride-based) | 7–14 days |
| Applied anti-slip coatings | 14 days minimum, longer for full chemical resistance |
| Mechanical re-finishing | Immediate (no cure period) |
| Tile replacement | 14 days, with grout fully cured and pool refilled and stabilised |
Re-testing too early gives a misleadingly low result; the surface has not yet stabilised.
For high-traffic pool environments, the post-treatment PTV is one piece of evidence; durability of the uplift is another. Follow-up testing at 6 and 12 months captures whether the treatment is holding or whether plant chemistry, traffic and cleaning have eroded the gain. The 12-month durability data is often more useful for risk management than the day-14 result alone.
Where the refurbishment includes a change to the cleaning regime (different products, different frequency, different rinsing protocol), the re-test should be conducted under the new regime — toward the end of the cleaning cycle, not immediately after a deep clean. This captures whether the new regime supports the achieved PTV in service.
Tell us about the pool and we'll come back with a quote within one working day.
Request a Quote